How big is a mansion is like asking how loud is thunder.
We know thunder is loud. Thunder is defined by loudness.
Likewise, a mansion is bigness; big is an inherent attribute of mansion
But, the question remains.
Related: Strange Mansions in Carmel, Indiana | McMansions vs. Really Big Houses | What is a Villa | Home Owners’ Association History | Palace vs. Castle vs. Manor House | Mansion with Swimming Pool | Mobile Homes History
What is a mansion?
We know a mansion is big. It’s synonymous with “big house”.
Merriam Webster dictionary defines mansion as “a large imposing residence.”
It’s a good, but broad definition because it includes both “large and “imposing”. In other words, a mansion is not merely a big house. It’s also imposing.
Imposing is defined as “impressive in size, bearing, dignity or grandeur.
There you have it. A mansion is a grand house.
Next, how big is a mansion?
What does Merriam Webster mean when it uses the term “large” in its definition?
Unfortunately, the dictionary doesn’t provide a footnote setting out the square footage when it uses the word “large”.
That leaves it to us to interpret, which I will gladly do.
What I set out below is my opinion as to how big a mansion is.
Mansion Defined – the Short Answer
Mansion: My opinion is that a mansion is a nicely designed home with 7,000 sq. ft. A ramshackle unimpressive house with 12,000 sq. ft. would not be a mansion in my view. Likewise, I’ve seen many grand houses that are 6,000 sq. ft. that certainly gives the impression of a mansion.
However, if forced to give a square footage number, I’ll say 7,000 sq. ft. I base this on being 3 times the size of the average newly-built house which is 2,320 sq. ft.
Mega Mansion: 20,000+ sq. ft. house (read my analysis below).
At the end of the day, it really is a personal opinion. What one person considers a mansion another might not.
For example, Cher, who is accustomed to living in spectacularly huge mansions such as this Beverly Hills mansion would likely have a different opinion as to what a large, imposing house is compared to me. After all, I currently live in a regular suburban house with 3,500 sq. ft. which isn’t small but certainly not a house Cher has lived in for many decades (if ever).
In other words, what one considers a mansion is relative.
“Mansion” in a historical context
Another way to approach this question is to examine mansions in a historical context. It’s interesting because, for centuries, mansions were outrageously huge. Think Chateau, palace and manor homes that stretch back hundreds of years. Not to mention castles.
The wealthy pre-industrial revolution had most of their wealth held in land. They collected rents and produced food and in some cases, goods that were sold. Because few were of this class, they owned vast estates that made them incredibly wealthy in relation to the rest of the population.
Then came the industrial revolution in the 19th century that created fortunes surpassing those of the aristocratic landowners many times over. Think coal, oil, steel, railroads, the rapid growth of corporations, etc. These “robber barons” became wealthier than anyone in history.
The industrial revolution also changed where folks lived. Many left the rural estates for better-paying jobs in cities and mines. This in turn, increased wages that had to be paid to workers on the estates ultimately chipping away at the landowners’ wealth.
By World War I the aristocracy’s power and wealth dwindled and continued losing grip on the economy and positions of power through WWII.
Moreover, at the same time, labor reforms came into place that not only slowed the widening wealth gap but reversed it. As wages and worker protections came into play, it became impossible for many landowners to pay for the dozens of employees it took to maintain such large houses.
From the end of WWII to the 1990’s the wealth gap was not nearly as pronounced as it’s become since 2000.
That is until the tech revolution in the late 1990’s, which once again changed and is changing the economic landscape. At the same time, many good jobs left the UK, the US, Canada, etc. to China and other lower-cost countries.
The result is the wealth gap starting to widen. It continues to widen to this day.
As the wealth gap widens, fortunes of the few grow to massive amounts relative to the rest of the population. The result is a resurgence in massive houses. Once again rich folk can afford to maintain ludicrously expensive-to-maintain estates.
As wealth grew in the late 1990s, display of ostentatious wealth grew and so folks who want part of that display but can’t really afford it, build “cheap mansions” which took on the demeaning term “McMansion“.
The McMansion is a large house built with cheaper materials. Their lasting impact is the rapid growth in the average size of houses.
In the 1950s, the size of the typical new home increased to 950 square feet, and “by the 60’s 1,100 square feet was typical, and by the 70’s, 1,350. Beginning with the recession in 2000, the average new house size stabilized to 2,320 (square feet),” according to the authors [Patch.com].
From the 1950s to the 2,000’s the average house size increased 2.4 times.
What does average house size have to do with defining a mansion?
It has everything to do with defining a mansion.
A mansion is defined in relation to average house size. Of course, people will disagree as to any precise size, but it’s safe to say that what folks considered a mansion in 1955 is different in 2020.
I have no evidence to base this on, but I suspect in the 1950’s a nice or imposing house that measured 5,000 sq. ft. was a mansion.
In 1955, a 5,000 sq. ft. house was more than 5 times the size of a newly built average house.
In 2020, a 5,000 sq. ft. house measures a tad more than 2 times the size of an average house. Hardly a mansion.
A house 5 times the size of the average house now would be 11,600 sq. ft. Three times measures 6,960 sq. ft. Hence I peg a mansion at 7,000 sq. ft.
Mansion by location
Another consideration when defining mansion is location.
A 5,000 square foot townhouse in Manhattan is arguably a mansion because it’s unusually large relative to the average dwelling in NYC. The average size of newly built apartments in NYC since the year 2000 is 866 sq. ft. That means a 5,000 sq. ft. townhome is more than 5 times the size of the average dwelling.
Sounds familiar, right? That’s about the same ratio of the average house size in the 1950’s to a 5,000 sq. ft. house.
What about the “Imposing” part of the definition?
Again, the term “imposing” is subjective. What I consider imposing others may not.
For example, there are some architectural styles that aren’t imposing at all.
Consider mid-century modern. It’s not imposing. However, there are some huge mid-century modern houses. Are they mansions?
Here’s an example of a 9,156 sq. ft. house that isn’t imposing yet is very large:
I’m not saying the above isn’t nice. It is. However, the design of the house is more unassuming than other styles.
Contrast the above 9,156 sq. ft. with the following which is considerably smaller, but looks more like a mansion:
However, when you look at an aerial view of the above home, you’ll see it is indeed large because it has a deep design. Check it out:
Now, compare the above unassuming mansion with the following house which has considerably fewer square feet:
In my view, the white 7,351 sq, ft. house looks more like a mansion than the 9,156 sq. ft. house above it.
What about a large converted barn coming in at 11,000 sq. ft. Is that a mansion? A barn is hardly imposing. Is it a mansion?
Again, a nicely designed converted barn, IMO is a mansion.
Where I draw the line would be some ramshackle, slapped up, cheap meandering house that may measure 13,000 sq. ft. but is ugly and cheap. This would not be a mansion in my opinion.
Rise of the Mega-Mansion
Mega-mansion is a relatively new term, but that doesn’t mean there haven’t always been mega-mansions.
50,000+ sq. ft. French chateaus are mega-mansions. Same with 30,000+ sq. ft. English manor homes. Some of these dwellings are hundreds of years old.
Think Downton Abbey, built in 1842, which comes in at a whopping 100,000 sq. ft. Here it is:
Surely that’s a mega-mansion.
Like mansion, the size of a mega-mansion is up for debate.
I define a mega-mansion as a grand house with 20,000+ sq. ft. You might even consider a house with 15,000+ sq. ft. as a mega-mansion. There is no shortage of large celebrity houses that are this big or larger.
Here’s an example of a 25,878 sq. ft. house.
Again, a mega mansion’s definition is relative to other houses. Is it 5X, 7X, 10X the average house?
I peg it at 8.5X the average house. 20,000 sq. ft. divided by 2,320 sq. ft. is 8.62.
Arguably 10X is not unreasonable.
After all, we have to give considerable meaning to the word mega? It must be rare; as in very few mansions are mega-mansions otherwise the definition has no teeth.
Here’s a chart setting out the size of celebrity houses in square feet by percentage (sample size: 248 celebrity houses).
We analyzed 248 celebrity houses. 4.4% were 20K to 30K sq. ft. 5.6% were 30K+ sq. ft.
That means 10% of celebrity houses in this sample came in above 20,000 sq. ft. in size.
Given most celebrities live in fairly large houses, the fact only 10% is bigger than 20,000 sq. ft. makes 20,000 sq. ft. an unusually large size.
It’s all relative
At the end of the day, a mansion is defined in relation to average houses.
What was considered a mansion in the 1950s is no longer a mansion.
What was imposing 60 years ago may not necessarily be the requisite for what is imposing today given evolving architectural styles.
We know this. A mansion is a house that inspires awe. A mega-mansion makes us exclaim “unbelievable.”