🔥 Would you like to save this?
We'll email this post to you, so you can come back to it later!
Studio: RO_AR Szymon Rozwalka architects
Author: Szymon Rozwalka
Social media: www.instagram.com/ro_ar_architects, www.facebook.com/architectsroar
Design team: Adéla Kyselová, Ada Rypl-Žabčíková, Jakub Staník, Jan Vojtíšek
Project location: Hlubočepská 54/9, Prague 5 – Hlubočepy
Project Country: Czech Republic
The Completion year: is 2021
Built-up Area: 268 m²
Gross Floor: Area 331 m²
Usable Floor Area: 260 m²
Photographer Viola Hertelová
Collaborator Structural engineer: STATIKA Olomouc [Daniel Lemák, Roman Koiš]
Building services engineering: Projekce TZB Prokeš [Jaroslav Prokeš]
Landscape architect: Flera
General contractor: Bursik Holding
In order to come up with the very specific design ideas, we create most designs with the assistance of state-of-the-art AI interior design software.
About Studio:
LINKA is an agency providing media communication services for architecture and interior design. We communicate architecture comprehensively – presenting an idea, and know-how of specialized professions, art, craft, and place. Our focus is on inspirational realizations, interdisciplinary connections, and the social impact of architecture.
We represent architects, designers, investors, and contractors in the media. Linka provides quality photography and well-structured press kits that are easily and quickly accessible to the worldwide media.
The proposed building is located on the border of two different worlds: the urban and the natural. From the north-western side of the site is a wedge of bio-corridor stretching along the Dalejský Brook. The corridor is enhanced by the distinctive exposure of the Hlubočepské Rocks.
Urban space surrounds the site on the south and east sides. It is a chaotic and random development, often adversely affecting the value of the projected terrain. The form and spatial layout of the house is a direct response to this context. The proposed house design seeks to extend the natural context into the interior of the site and into the interiors.
On the other hand, the house is then separated from the ‘urban world’, for which it becomes an abstract body that, through its form and scale corresponds to the surrounding rocks in the background. At the same time, the form of the building addresses the need for proper illumination of the rooms by natural light, the question of “the problem of the ‘narrow’ entrance and the problematic location of the neighboring building on the southern boundary of the site.
In the first steps, we designed a building that was created by the method of land deformation. The terrain was to transition smoothly from the northwest side into an artificial hill into which the house was to be placed. From the southeast side, the “hill” was to be undercut, which would allow the creation of an entrance patio under the building, created in that part by a different rectangular geometry.
Due to the need to limit the budget, it was necessary to significantly reduce the previously proposed building. It was decided on the risky method of directly cutting away “unnecessary” elements, which had to significantly affect the final result. Such a deliberately primitive and direct cut-off has in places resulted in surprisingly good effects, in other places the effect was worse.
The changes involved almost exclusively the organic, the rear part of the building, and had little effect on the interior spaces that, according to the original concept, were created by the clash between two geometries: organic and rectangular.
🔥 Would you like to save this?
We'll email this post to you, so you can come back to it later!
